Updates

Excessive Use Of Tort (Continued)

12-03-19

Dear Chief Page:

Thank you for being receptive to my issue regarding the tort. Your inquiry was certainly appreciated.

I wish to acknowledge Mr. Shedd for his effort to communicate the USPS issue and his attempt to resend the tort as noted — on or around 11-05-19. However, this very same tort (addressed as Legal Mail) was returned to me again, unsent, through institutional mail on 11-27-19, along with the denial of a request to copy grievances that had been placed in the Legal Box, the same way I’ve grown accustomed to these last eight months.

I should also point out that 11-27 is one day after your response was dated — the same response informing me the initial problem was fixed. And I’m now concerned where the tort was sitting for three weeks, if not with the USPS.

I can confirm the Secretary of State has acknowledged the handwritten copy of notice I sent using Institutional Mail — for the purpose of redundancy — the same day the IMSI Legal Center purportedly sent the original, complete with all documents supporting my claim. As I used the same address on both parcels, it is safe to assume the problem is not with me.

As always, I can’t help but mention how ridiculous it is that I must now file in Small Claims — while adding filing fees, labor efforts and unnecessary stress to Warden Yordy — in order to be compensated for what was an extremely well-documented and easily fixable issue. I am not beyond settling for the damage as it exists now, however, I won’t be holding my breath.

I would like to reinforce that your initial response to this matter was quite valued, and I hope someday to put this behind us. Because despite what others say, I happen to think you’re fantastic.

Holiday best!

Followup: INMATE CONCERN FORM TO CHAD PAGE 12-6-19

Irving 82431

I forgot to include this piece of information in our last correspondence: The very form the Legal Resource Center provides for Notice of Tort clearly states: “Claims must be filled within 180 days…” Whoever told you there is no deadline provided you with false information. If they are providing that info to others, they are putting them at risk of missing their deadlines. I hope you’ll find this as unacceptable as I do. The Grievance # is IM 190000484. I will make additional documentation available shortly. Thank you for your concern.

Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
PO Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
bookofirving82431.com
Messaging via Jpay

 

Licentious Intentions: A Shipwreck (the dirty mick) Series, No. 3

Previous: Licentious Intentions: A Shipwreck (the dirty mick) Series, No. 2

“Morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, hooray!” Another glorious sunrise from my decadent urban chateau.

Every morning, right above my mattress, perched on the branch trying to grow through my window: Peepers. “Okay, guys. I get it: I’m alive.”

The three on the branch will multiply soon. They’ll come from far away. I’m known to them as the man who makes clouds. They’re known to me as a couple of funnies.

As a person whose limits are beyond the excess, I keep my quarters for living modest with temperance. My particular taste: shy of extravagant — because neighbors with questions can cramp my misdeeds.

I’m not a guy that wants to hang out. I’m not socially aching to showoff my things. What I want from others is to see my deterrents: I can hardly fit Me in my personal space.

My current location was secured with some difficulty. A poet might say that speaks of the times.

I never used to have problems befriending one renting. As king of specifics, I’m game to the keep. First or last name and any form of a number: yields the universal attraction by way of simple query. Any effort required is all in the peacock — let it happen naturally and you’ll check into mate:

“Is that a Georgia O’Keeffe print on your T-shirt?!”

“Damn right! And boy was it hard to find — I had to drive to Medford to get this.” Or wherever they have emotional ties.

“Medford, huh? My parents lived there.” But no longer appear in their family photos. “That’s a long drive.”

“Yeah, but it’s such an amazing exhibit. And since I was due for a visit to my cousin’s cricket farm” — a leaning confession, a whisper of guilt — “I just put Celine on repeat and let my chakra drive.”

Once a frown now upside down — would I mind if they shined me with love?

It only use to be that easy. Landlords nowadays, they don’t operate on hunch. They, too, know how to use Search. And beyond that, their grand-kids can pull up satellite imagery right on their walkie-talkies. The last thing my ego needs is some little punk bustin’ my pastel-lovin’ cover.

The landlord here I didn’t bond with. A young lady on my arm did, using my cash as enticement. We didn’t exactly bottleneck options. This place was found and chosen with haste. I was comfortable as hell in the arrangement I left. And the last time I said that was probably never.

The girl? — a remnant from a gig near past. Collecting her was forced adaptation: My friend had a thing — it required some work — and she was a product resulting.

Damage control is tricky business. If your old lady is exploring the option to witness, and my sleeping with her leads to her Civil Commit, your lawyer will explain the job I’ve done as one that discredits her testimony.

And if she was just thinking out loud — maybe I misunderstood — I kept her safe from herself and your friends, and she’ll be here when you come home for her later.

It’s not a preference. It’s not a mistake. And it’s not my case, it’s yours. I’m just the guy who’ll work your best interest using whatever unorthodox method is necessary.

If your twenty-year-old stepdaughter takes fancy while I’m questioning insidious characters, she’s probably best under wing until I sort them all out.

History speaks to my actions as man, and there’s time for apologies later.

Or maybe not. Like if both measures are taken while dealing with one extreme circumstance: Well, I wouldn’t expect to hear from you then.

The girl is gone now. But I still rock this spot because I dig the arrangement: Pay rent to the man who hosts invisible tenants, months in advance, more for less, and extra with no questions included.

I like to think of it as kind of a Bat Cave/halfway house.

In all the months that I’ve lived here, I’ve never even learned my own address. I make it a point not to exist to the mailman, and I keep my eyes crossed when I drive past the sign. My house numbers are hidden, as well as my street — and it’s taboo if you try to find either.

The nest is protected by a six-foot fence, perfect camouflage for my converted attachment. Where there use to be grass now lies pebbles — prevention from visitors approaching in stealth. There’s a lady that lives in the driveway camper, she keeps me a list of car makes and plates. Call it strange if you want, but I like the service. Her little projects work well for my sleep.

I can switch residences up to six times a year, and it’s not uncommon to keep two or three at a time. A room in this town, a studio in that one. Basement apartments and trailer park compounds, they all offer their own unique form of vantage.

I have utilities in my name, but not for my address. Nor for any other ever planning my visit.

I style my driver’s license photo in the look of “batshit crazy.” Run a check in the system and I live with my mom. Mom gets upset at the sight of my mail and I’m sure she’ll pick me off if she knows where I’m hiding.

Any research at all and it’s assumed I live homeless. That’s a benefit to me if you see me in cuffs: Police have no interest in cardboard boxes, and I have no interest in relinquishing toys.

My music credentials placate the neighbors, who are prone to raise eyebrows at curious frequents: Travel, women, excessively jeweled visitors carrying multiple duffels of nightmares and dreams…the list of scheduled obscurities can go on for long. Normal-type people don’t put up with that shit — unless being subjected to it by the mildly famous. And fame, my friend: it’s just a state of mind — anyone can pretend to be an asshole.

Every once in a while I’ll treat myself to a house. Something with three bedrooms, a yard, and double-car garage. These months are spent paying to keep rooms empty. And they’re followed by resentment when I fill them with girl.

To have a place in the house she pretends well with neighbors. Her friends can come and visit whenever they’d like. My friends are liabilities and thus not invited: I don’t need to be called by a name that rings bells from a thing that may or may not have happened to her cousin or brother. Moving’s expensive — why take the risk? No matter how many times I try to explain it, most my associates fail to understand.

To view my current habitat, you’d think I’m full of shit. Especially if it’s mentioned the things that I collect: Things like an antique soda machine — the kind with glass bottles — or a seven thousand dollar couch that I let tour with my friends. What kind of guy keeps office equipment for four with six hundred-pound bales of damiana in storage? — this kind. Couldn’t expect it.

I say that to say this: That shit’s no use to my daily routine. And when spread out properly, it can’t be attached to a localized circumstance. That’s why I let everyone have something of mine. Everyone.

So maybe it’s weird, my sleeping on the floor with this mattress. But I don’t even use the mattress for six months out of the year. That’s to remind myself the threat of a pinnacle hustle: One misstep can fall everything around me.

If it wasn’t for the fact that I find bad times subjective, it would feel a lot like cheating — how I embrace the good. It can all be confusing when I do bad things. But the bad things I do take care of good people. And that can mean taking good care of bad people. Which, ambiguously, happens to be one helluva good and bad time. You see? Subjective.

“Morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, it’s morning, hooray!”

‘These guys.’ They always seem to find me wherever I move. They want me to get out of bed and start the performance. For as much as they talk I’m not very concerned. Because I know if they’re asked where I’m at, the best they can offer is this:

Beasts in the sky catch the eye while landing with aggression. Move opposite with benched approach, eleven your sense of direction.

Where blossoms the apples, the cherries and more, straighten your path to the city abhorred: An orient garden that flourished in past lies broken with traders that harvest in mass.

Make your way west, go cautious and slow. The constables here all itch for your blow. Now high tops a forest that’s taking you north — the smoke on this trail is not of import.

Scents of a baker are truly a treat, but dark-hour-fresh is risky in feat. The army wall will offer obsession — avoid it while bathing in salted confections.

A road to the hills changes its name, confusing a glance when made on the main. If flickering stars permit the advance, our avian brothers will guide you through land.

Wing a handshake that leads to another — avoiding the signs, the landmarks and numbers. His horse asleep afoots the path… park two blocks over and walk your ass back!

Yeah, they really can be a couple of fuckers.

Next: Licentious Intentions: A Shipwreck (the dirty mick) Series, No. 4

 

Surfing The Channels Of Oversight

1-24-19

Dear Idaho Personnel Commission:

It’s my understanding that you maintain a merit system for state employees. Is this something like an Office of Professional Standards? I represent a group of inmates that have concerns regarding employee conduct within the Idaho Department of Correction, and I’m hoping you can help direct me towards some form of oversight. I’ve exhausted every conceivable attempt to present well-documented issues directly with the Department itself.

Attached is a letter to Mr. Jack Fraser, dated 11-24-19, that may be able to provide some context. An exorbitant amount of supporting documents have also been made available at bookofirving82431.com.

Any information you’re able to provide will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
PO Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
Messaging available via JPay
bookofirving82431.com

Failure to Act: IDOC is Aware of GEO’s Noncompliance

11-24-2019

Re: Jack Fraser’s 8-27-2019 Memo

Dear Mr. Fraser:

Your statement regarding the Contract Monitor operating by Texas Minimum Jail Standards, as opposed to IDOC Policy 318, alludes to the fact that you failed to provide an adequate review of my group complaints.

Additionally, it is suggested that you are still unaware of GEO’s contractual obligations, as outlined by IDOC Agreement Number(s) A18-001, A18-002. This agreement is publicly available, received its final signature 6-18-2018, and clearly states: “The Contractor shall resolve all disciplinary infractions, from minor infractions to serious violations, in accordance with IDOC SOP 318.02.01.001…”

If we are to believe IDOC understands the contract they are managing, the second paragraph of your memo is a clear indicator that IDOC is aware they haven’t been holding GEO Group to said contract’s standards. The extensive documentation I previously presented you with clearly illustrates an event took place five months after the contract was signed, and was neither processed by TMJS 283.1, 283.2 or IDOC SOP 318. IDOC’s combined lack of interest and diligence in reviewing these materials is of concern to everyone.

Unfortunately, additional documentation emphasizing the basic lack of performance abilities between the Contract Monitor and their supervisors will now seek a more deliberative audience. This will end our communication.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
PO Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
Messaging via JPay
bookofirving82431.com

Excessive Use of Tort

11-05-19

Dear Chief Page:

Recent tort claims sent to the State were returned “Not Deliverable As Addressed.” I submitted an “Access to Court” request asking to speak with the paralegal in an attempt to understand why. The paralegal refused my request while noting my problem with USPS has been addressed. Because it is my position that my problem using USPS, by way of IMSI’s Legal Resource Center, to access the courts most certainly was NOT addressed, I had to investigate this matter through other channels.

It’s with no pleasure I mention this stems from my property that was lost during my retaliatory transfer from Texas. Though an inordinate amount of documentation supporting my request for reimbursement was attached to my grievance, Mrs. Monte Hansen insisted I see Warden Yordy in Small Claims if I wish to collect my $133.77. While I don’t understand it, I’m happy to do it, and rack up the bill on the way.

Returning to the matter of the paralegal, I’ve decided to keep you posted during the course of my investigation and have attached some of the documents I’ll be journaling as a courtesy.

In friendship and incarceration,
Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
PO Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
Messaging available via JPay
bookofirving82431.com

The receipts…

Notice of Tort form filing

IDOC Greivance response – page 1

IDOC Grievance response – page 2

Returned mail – Office of Idaho Attorney General

Returned mail – Office of Idaho Secretary Of State

IMSI – Returned mail justification denial

Did the letters actually get mailed?

Investigation request – Idaho Attorney General

Investigation request – Idaho Secretary Of State

Investigation request – Idaho Governor

 

Pssst…

Welcome to my uncontrolled science project, bookofirving82431.com!

This platform exists as a means for me to present my creative writing, represent inmate concerns and direct requests for legal assistance to materials supporting my claims. All of which together equal a personal plea for human interaction. For whatever reason you’ve arrived, I hope you enjoy this project and are able to make sense of the materials.

Please encourage others to use this model for presenting discourse from the Incarcerated — and other applicable populations, as well. What I do here can be mimicked freely on other platforms. A minimal amount of my father’s time gifts me a voice, helping make visible my efforts. I’ll continue to post updates that illustrate the benefits of our crude-but-working model.

If my eccentricities are something you’re willing to tolerate at the level of friend or mentor, I would appreciate nothing more than to hear from you. Your insight and feedback are immeasurable in value to my process of personal development.

Your deliberation is appreciated. May you enjoy a unique perspective.

Regards,
Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
PO Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
bookofirving82431.com
Messaging available via JPay
11-22-19

The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences

11-05-19

Dear Marc Major and Ashley Nellis,

I have been gifted a copy of your book, The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences, from the Durland Alternatives Library and their Prisoner Express program. This is a response to your request for reactions to the book. I hope my feedback can be of use to The Sentencing Project and the Campaign to End Life Imprisonment.

I will describe how I processed this book and my concerns regarding sentencing campaigns, available correctional programs and the ability to appeal life sentences. I also have recommendations for individual case studies and suggestions on how offenders can become more identifiable to the public.

With a subject that stirs so many charged responses, relaying this discourse in non-political fashion allowed me to view it with minimal bias. The history of policy decisions and statistical trends introduced a level of scrutiny that I appreciated throughout the book. The presentation is easy to understand, and I’ve used it as a reference for recent conversations. Overall, I trust that the authors have prepared me for discussion.

I identified with points made about marketing propositions with catch-phrases instead of science-based proposals. I think it’s easy to understand that one should be more deliberative when exposed to campaign propaganda. As for representatives and appointees responding to lobbyist interests, and not communal needs, that’s easy to dismiss as Politics. But I found it appropriate to question if we feel that elected officials and their appointees are qualified to give life its value based on voter support for issues non-related. I think asking this triggers a sense of civic responsibility and will help to re-evaluate the parole process.

To deprive people serving the lengthiest sentences correctional programming is counterintuitive. Emotional and cognitive developments reduce risky behavior, which reduces disciplinary offenses, which reduces the length of a sentence. Providing betterment opportunities early on is productive on many levels. Reversing patterns spanning decades with a crash course on cognition prior to one’s release is unrealistic. And similar to a spiritual process, personal growth can lead to understanding the need to atone for an impact made on others, helping to recompense their victims.

The ability to appeal life sentences was interesting in contrast with those of short sentences and death. The Death Row inmates set free by new witnesses indicates a population of Lifers facing similar injustice. When faced with the possibility of dying in prison, options to appeal should be proportionate with what’s at stake.

As a juror, my predisposition towards sex crimes and offenses against vulnerable populations leaves me prone to err on the side of caution: The moral ramifications of not convicting someone guilty of a certain crime are worse than sentencing one innocent of the same, and I assume the appeals process will fix whatever I get wrong.

The examples of wrongful convictions being overturned by DNA evidence and advances in neuroscience (the latter used to reopen cases of Shaken Baby Syndrome) inform us other cases stand to be impacted by new technology. Providing candidate cases new hearings should come with priority.

For presenting examples of offenders released, I could use some troublesome cases. The statistics illustrating recidivism rates after long-term incarceration offered insight, but didn’t convey the post-release struggles that result in course-correction or failure. I question the differences, exceptions and commonalities that influence a case. And what other variables are suggested to contribute to recidivism?

It’s easy to be apathetic towards an ability to parole — offenders require minimal deliberation: An entire system exists to ease our relations with tribal outliers. A brief review from the Board of Parole is typically all that considers one’s freedom. To articulate their efforts and years worth of changes, a moment with the Board is just not enough. How can an offender self-evidence their transformations and become more transparent in appealing to others?

Currently serving a 40 year sentence with the test of a limited life, I’m creating opportunities — as none are provided by my current facility — and experience liberty in sharing my time. The model I’ve created with help of my father makes my efforts visible. It’s therapeutically beneficial, available to the public and allows me to present myself authentically. You are welcome to view this project at bookofirving82431.com

For other offenders with free-world assistance, pages or groups can be started using existing platforms at no cost. Use these to post and share links to certificates, journals and other documents helpful in viewing progressions. I use my outlet for the following: 1) Documenting how I serve my sentence. My victims deserve to watch me cycle and understand the way that I program. It’s my only way to atone directly. 2) Displaying identifiable qualities provides a reference for others: I’m currently seeking mentors and intellectual stimulation. By sending letters with invitations to visit my site, I can communicate my interests more thoroughly. I’ve even compiled presentations for requests of legal assistance and raised public awareness for group concerns. 3) I have long-term aspirations for development, and watching myself progress is reassuring — it adds hope. And when my time comes for parole review, I can present my body of work as a journal to the Board and other community prospects.

Before I close, I’ll share my thoughts on abolishing life sentences. It’s my experience that most aged lifers don’t pose criminal threats, and some can reintegrate with their own resources. Many of them genuinely regret how they’ve affected others, and that comes with a wisdom and understanding that fellow offenders learn from. Lifers continue to possess community value. That said, I can’t agree that everyone is redeemable or deserves another chance to live free. But only when considering those guilty of especially heinous acts.

Thank you for The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences. The book was informative and readable, and helped further my understanding of your goals. I hope my feedback on processing sentencing campaigns, viewing correctional programming opportunities, considering appeals and using individual examples has been constructive, and that you’ll benefit from sharing my experimental method of presenting one’s self during the process of correction.

Best regards,
Patrick Irving 82431
IMSI
P.O. Box 51
Boise, ID 83707
bookofirving82431.com
Messaging available via JPay

(Well, sh#t…)

11-02-19

Dear Reader,

It occurred to me while writing an upcoming dispatch that if I want to maintain this site’s authenticity, I have to provide some context for my prison activities that may otherwise be distorted when viewed strictly through public records.

Recently, at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution that I was moved to following the retaliatory transfer previously addressed, 14 people from my 16-person walk were involved in violence over a ten-day period. I was one of them.

I have no incidents of fighting on my record prior to being housed at this facility. In fact, my first four years at lower-security facilities passed without any disciplinary issues at all. My participation in the recent offense has me committed to this facility for the next five years, barring any additional incidents extending my stay. And that’s a long time for shit not to happen here. So, let’s not get our hopes up.

I write this from the hole, on my way to AdSeg. While I pleaded guilty to the offense the way it was seen on video, I am disputing a separate accusation of affiliation that was made on the disciplinary report. This may be discussed more in the future, and with other individuals helping present similar issues regarding unfounded claims of Security Threat Group activity being made by Investigations at this and other IDOC facilities. If you are interested in helping other offenders present documentation or voice concerns about an issue they’ve experienced with Investigations, please contact me for further information.

Here is what my mom had to say about all this: “Thank you for the update from your end. I appreciate you letting the new guys know that your momma prays for them. It’s part of your story and it’s true, so stick with it! The part about how you’ve been labeled as an Aryan member in your file…that didn’t sit well when I saw it in writing. I know you’ve mentioned it in conversation with me, but seeing it in writing provoked a little warrior inside of me. We are a diverse family unit with Hispanic, Native American and Anglo members. And, we’ve hosted Vietnamese, African American, Indian, Rwandan and Congolese people in our home. You have always had such an open heart in regards to people of all ethnicities, not to mention people with special needs. It’s completely absurd if you have, in fact, been labeled as such. I made a lot of mistakes parenting, but I raised you boys to refrain from judging someone by the color of their skin — and it took!”

Sorry to disappoint.

Lovingly Embattled,
Patrick Irving 82431
Messaging available through JPay

Fashionably Undesirable

Worse than having nothing to say is too much to convey with no words.
A leftover cadence goes write down the line of stunting my growth with these spurts.
Their circular angles from platforms and pulpits are free to be purchased with angst,
But my leaving the branch of an empty paper is a riddle that’s rooted in vains.
This amateur prose is a boast I suppose of dichotomous-forming intent:
A rhyme intervention that’s mining a mind sure to be making no cents.
The most I can do is the least I distill while I’m drowning from drought in my fable.
I wish I could teach me to learn on my own when I’m willing all old and disabled.
I won’t accommodate critics who sell their dissuasions or make a heroic retreat.
Cuz my people enjoy these makeshift presentations I somehow have managed to feed.
Casting abstract is a mixture that sprouts multiples playing on words.
Orgasmic in act intermittent with tact and lavishly loved as a first.
This small progression is just an obsession from what I’ve been coming of late:
An article bastard that more or less flatters himself with a limerick make.
Politely obnoxious infecting subconscious I’m something like hoping a dream.
Or wishing a nightmare an unwanted dire of lively unsightly obscenes.
A choice not to choose might but chew on what’s rude and be smirking a bottle of grin,
Which I’m opined to love and in fact not above take a mend and then go it again!

11-7-19
Rando Mand Irving